It is a fair question. For many years, the evidence was limited. We now have a much clearer picture: for many common psychological difficulties, online therapy can be as effective as therapy delivered in person.
What the research shows
Across randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses, video-based psychotherapy has been found to produce outcomes broadly comparable to in-person therapy for a range of common difficulties, including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.1, 2
Research also suggests that a strong therapeutic alliance, meaning the working relationship between client and psychologist, can be established and maintained through video-based psychotherapy. The quality of this relationship is one of the more reliable predictors of therapeutic outcome, regardless of whether therapy takes place online or in person.3
The finding has held up across a growing body of research. Where differences do appear between online and in-person delivery, they are generally small and inconsistent in direction, rather than showing a consistent advantage for either format. The important qualification is that effectiveness is not simply a property of the format. The psychologist, therapeutic approach, clinical presentation and circumstances of the person seeking therapy all matter.
Where online therapy has the advantage
Online therapy offers some practical advantages that can make accessing and sustaining psychological treatment considerably easier.
In a country the size of South Africa, access is an important consideration. Clinical psychologists are concentrated in certain areas, while access in smaller towns and rural communities can be considerably more limited. Online therapy can meaningfully expand the range of psychologists available to someone, without requiring them to travel long distances.
Where it is less suitable
Online therapy is not appropriate for everyone or for every clinical situation. Suitability depends on the nature and severity of the difficulty, the level of support available, and the circumstances in which therapy would take place.
Online therapy may not be the right choice when:
Part of an initial assessment is establishing whether online therapy is clinically appropriate for your situation. If we believe that in-person work or another level of care would be safer or more appropriate, we will tell you and help you consider other options.
What about EMDR online?
EMDR is sometimes assumed to require a therapist to be physically present because the traditional protocol uses guided eye movements. In practice, EMDR can also be adapted for online therapy. Depending on the protocol and the individual, bilateral stimulation may involve guided eye movements, alternating sounds or therapist-guided tapping.
Research into online EMDR is developing, with early findings suggesting that it can be effective for appropriately assessed clients.4 Careful assessment remains important. Online EMDR is not suitable for everyone, and the decision to work online or in person should take into account clinical presentation, stability, safety and the individual’s circumstances. More about this can be found on our EMDR therapy online page and in our discussion of the evidence behind EMDR.
The evidence, briefly
For many adults seeking therapy, online sessions produce outcomes comparable to in-person work, and a strong therapeutic relationship can be established and maintained over video. The more useful question is not simply whether therapy is online or in-person. It is whether the psychologist, therapeutic approach and format are appropriate for you.
Getting the most out of a video session
A few practical things can make online therapy more comfortable and effective:
We work with adults across South Africa through a secure, encrypted video connection. If you are wondering whether online therapy would suit you, that is exactly the kind of question to raise in an enquiry.
The bottom line
For many people and many psychological difficulties, online therapy can provide an effective and clinically meaningful way of working with a psychologist. At the same time, the format is not right for everyone. The question is less about whether online or in-person therapy is universally better, and more about which approach is appropriate for you, your circumstances and the work you need to do.
This article is general information, not a substitute for individual professional advice, assessment or treatment. If you are in crisis, please see our emergency resources.
Sources
- Fernandez, E., et al. (2021). Live psychotherapy by video versus in-person: A meta-analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1535–1549.
- Norwood, C., et al. (2018). Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 25(6), 797–808.
- Flückiger, C., et al. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340.
- de Jongh, A., et al. (2024). State of the science: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. Journal of Traumatic Stress.
