Insights · Relationships

Setting boundaries without guilt

“Set better boundaries” has become common advice, often offered as though the difficulty were simply knowing how to say no. Most people who struggle with boundaries already know what they should say. They know when something is too much, when they do not want to agree, or when a request is taking more from them than they can reasonably give.

The difficulty is what happens when they actually say it. There may be guilt. Anxiety. A fear that someone will be disappointed, angry or hurt. An urge to explain, soften the boundary or take it back altogether. Sometimes the hardest part of setting a boundary is not finding the words. It is learning that another person’s discomfort does not necessarily mean you have done something wrong.

What a boundary actually is

A common misunderstanding is that a boundary is a demand that someone else behave differently. It is not. A boundary is a statement about what you will do. “Please don’t call me late at night” is a request. It depends on the other person’s cooperation. “I don’t answer calls after nine; I’ll respond in the morning” is a boundary. It describes your own action.

That distinction matters because you cannot control another person’s behaviour. You can, however, decide what you are willing to participate in, what you will accept, and what you will do when a limit is crossed.

A boundary does not have to be complicated. Sometimes it is simply:

I can’t take that on.
I’m not available tonight.
I understand that you’re disappointed. My decision hasn’t changed.
No, I’m not able to do that.
I’ve asked you not to do that. If it happens again, I’m going to leave.

The boundary is not the argument that follows. It is the limit.

Why setting one can feel wrong

If a boundary is reasonable, why can setting one produce such disproportionate guilt? Often because the emotion is responding to more than the situation in front of you.

You may have learned, somewhere along the way, that keeping other people comfortable was part of being safe, loved, useful or acceptable. Perhaps conflict had consequences. Perhaps someone else’s mood dominated the household. Perhaps being easy to manage was rewarded. Perhaps you became very good at anticipating what other people needed before asking what you needed yourself.

These rules are not necessarily conscious, and they are not necessarily irrational in the context in which they developed. A child who learns to monitor other people’s moods may have been responding intelligently to the environment around them. The difficulty is that a strategy that was once protective can continue operating long after it is needed.

Research on self-silencing describes a related pattern in which people suppress their own thoughts, feelings and needs in order to preserve relationships or avoid conflict. Research over several decades has linked greater self-silencing with poorer psychological wellbeing, including depressive symptoms.1, 2 The problem, then, is not that you care too much about other people. It is that caring for other people can sometimes come at the expense of staying connected to our own needs and perspective.

Why boundaries produce guilt

Guilt can be useful. It can alert us when we have acted against our values or harmed someone. But guilt is an emotion, not a verdict. It can also appear when you have violated an old internal rule.

If your rule is I must always be available to people I care about, saying no may produce guilt even when your decision is entirely reasonable. If your rule is I am responsible for other people’s feelings, someone else’s disappointment may feel like evidence that you have failed. If your rule is conflict is dangerous, even a calm disagreement may trigger a powerful urge to repair it immediately.

The feeling is real. The conclusion may not be. This is an important distinction in boundary work: feeling guilty does not necessarily mean you have behaved badly. Sometimes it means you have done something unfamiliar.

The beliefs that can make boundaries difficult

Sometimes, what makes a boundary difficult is not the boundary itself, but what you believe will happen if you set it.

Other people’s needs come before mine.
If someone is disappointed, I need to fix it.
If I can help, I should.
If I say no, they will think I don’t care.
If someone is angry with me, I have done something wrong.
If I put myself first, I am selfish.
If I don’t keep everyone happy, I may lose the relationship.

These rules can become so familiar that they no longer sound like rules. They sound like reality. That is why being told to “set boundaries” is sometimes not enough. You may understand intellectually that you are allowed to say no while another part of you is still expecting something terrible to happen when you do. The work is not simply learning a sentence. It is learning to tolerate what you feel after saying it.

What makes a boundary hold

The effectiveness of a boundary depends less on finding the perfect words than on what happens afterwards.

State it plainly. Long justifications can unintentionally turn a boundary into a negotiation. “I can’t take that on” may be enough. You do not have to construct a case for why your limit is legitimate.

Expect some discomfort. If someone has become accustomed to your availability, a new limit may not be welcomed immediately. Their reaction tells you something about how they respond to your boundary; it does not, by itself, tell you whether the boundary is reasonable.

Be consistent. A limit that changes every time someone becomes upset can teach both people that persistence may eventually change the answer.

Do not confuse explanation with permission. You can explain your decision if you want to, but you do not need another person’s agreement before your boundary becomes valid.

Start where the stakes are manageable. If asserting yourself is unfamiliar, you do not necessarily need to begin with the most difficult relationship in your life. Practising in lower-stakes situations can help you discover that discomfort is tolerable and that saying what you need does not automatically lead to catastrophe. Assertiveness training has a substantial evidence base, and more recent research continues to support structured assertiveness interventions for difficulties involving social anxiety and inhibited self-expression.3, 4

The aim is not to become harder. It is to become more able to remain yourself in the presence of another person’s reaction.

Boundaries are not walls

There is another misconception worth correcting. Healthy boundaries are not about becoming emotionally detached, refusing to compromise or putting yourself first all the time. Relationships require flexibility. Sometimes you accommodate someone because you love them. Sometimes you change your plans because something matters to them. Sometimes you give more than you receive for a period because that is what the relationship requires.

The important question is whether this is a choice or whether you feel you have no choice. There is a significant difference between I want to do this for you and I have to do this, otherwise I will feel guilty. One is generosity. The other may mean that your needs and preferences are being consistently pushed aside.

When accommodation becomes the relationship

A pattern can develop in which one person increasingly accommodates and the other increasingly expects accommodation. Nothing dramatic may happen. There may be no obvious confrontation. You simply become the person who adjusts. You change your plans. You answer the call. You tolerate the comment. You explain yourself again. You let something go. Then you do it again.

Eventually, the relationship can become organised around an assumption that your flexibility is unlimited. This is one reason boundaries can change relationships. Not necessarily because the boundary damages the relationship, but because it makes the existing pattern visible.

Someone who is accustomed to your constant availability may experience your first limit as rejection. Someone who is accustomed to getting their way may call the boundary unreasonable. Someone who genuinely cares about you may simply need time to adjust. These reactions are not equivalent. A boundary gives you information about the relationship as well as information about yourself.

When it is more than a skills problem

Sometimes the difficulty with boundaries is primarily practical. You may need to learn how to communicate more clearly, tolerate some discomfort and follow through. But sometimes it runs deeper.

If saying no produces intense fear, if you cannot identify what you want until you know what someone else wants, if another person’s disappointment feels unbearable, if you repeatedly find yourself in relationships where you do the accommodating, or if you feel responsible for regulating everyone else’s emotions, boundary-setting may not simply be a communication problem.

There may be a longstanding pattern of self-silencing, self-sacrifice or subjugation underneath it. These patterns can involve suppressing your own needs and preferences in order to maintain connection, avoid conflict or preserve a sense of acceptance. Research on self-silencing suggests that these relational patterns are associated with psychological distress and can become deeply embedded ways of relating.1, 2 And that is not a failure of effort. It is something that can be understood.

When someone crosses the boundary anyway

Sometimes you state a boundary clearly, calmly and reasonably and the other person crosses it anyway. They keep calling after you have said you are not available. They continue a conversation after you have said you want it to stop. They keep asking after you have said no. They repeat behaviour you have explicitly said is not acceptable.

This is an important distinction: a boundary cannot make another person behave differently. It tells them what you will and will not participate in, and what you will do if that limit is crossed. If you say, “I am not going to continue this conversation while you are shouting,” the boundary is not that the other person will stop shouting. It is that you will end the conversation if they continue.

Sometimes, however, the issue is more serious. In relationships involving control, coercion or abuse, boundaries may be deliberately ignored, challenged or punished. The person may argue with your limit, demand explanations, turn it back on you, or simply behave as though your “no” does not matter.

In these situations, communicating the boundary more clearly is not necessarily the answer. The boundary may need to become an action: ending the conversation, leaving the situation, limiting contact, reducing access to you, or ending the relationship. You do not need someone else’s agreement before deciding what you will participate in. And you do not have to keep explaining a boundary to someone who has repeatedly shown that they are unwilling to respect it.

A boundary is not a way of controlling another person. Sometimes it is simply a decision about what you will do to protect yourself when another person will not respect your limit.

What therapy might focus on

Therapy is not about teaching you to say no to everyone. It is about understanding why your own no may feel so difficult, and what you have learned to believe about your needs, other people’s reactions and the safety of taking up space.

The work may involve recognising old relational patterns, understanding where they came from, and learning to tolerate the guilt, fear or discomfort that can arise when you respond differently. It may also involve practising how to express a need, hold a boundary, and remain connected to yourself when someone else is disappointed.

And sometimes the work is not about changing the relationship. When a relationship is controlling, abusive or unsafe, therapy can help you recognise what is happening, strengthen your sense of agency, and think through what you need to protect yourself, including creating distance or finding a safe way to leave.

Over time, the aim is not to become harder or less caring. It is to become more able to remain connected to yourself while deciding what and who you are willing to remain connected to.

Worth remembering

Guilt might not be proof that a boundary is wrong. Sometimes it is simply the emotional residue of an old rule that says you should have no limits. The goal is not to stop caring about other people. It is to stop disappearing in order to keep them comfortable.

A healthy boundary does not say: You must feel okay with my decision. It says: This is what I am able to do. This is what I am not able to do. And I can tolerate the fact that you may not like it. That is not selfishness. It is part of remaining connected to another person without losing contact with yourself.

And sometimes that is the real work of boundaries. Not learning how to say no. Learning that you can disappoint someone without having to abandon yourself.

If this pattern is familiar, and boundaries continue to feel frightening, guilt-inducing or almost impossible to hold, you are welcome to send an enquiry.

This article is general information, not a substitute for individual professional advice, assessment or treatment. If you are in crisis, please see our emergency resources.

Sources

  1. Jack, D. C., Brody, L. R., & Sikov, J. (2026). Advancing the next generation of research on self-silencing and depression: a narrative review and synthesis of three decades of research. Sex Roles, 92, Article 7.
  2. Pintea, S., & Gatea, A. (2021). The relationship between self-silencing and depression: a meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 40(4), 333–352.
  3. Speed, B. C., Goldstein, B. L., & Goldfried, M. R. (2018). Assertiveness training: a forgotten evidence-based treatment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 25(1), e12216.
  4. Hede, J. P., Malouff, J. M., & Meynadier, J. (2026). A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of assertiveness training for social anxiety. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 11, Article 28.

Keep reading

When you feel ready

You can learn to hold your boundaries

Please get in touch with either Kirsten Barnardt or Karen Fleming for a confidential enquiry.